95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
61.12%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 25.14%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.81%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
80.95%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 71.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
12.30%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 37.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
G&A change of 29.55% while KGC maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.45%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 1306.61%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
547.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 313.54%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
88.65%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 30.21%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.04%
Similar D&A growth to KGC's 36.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
45.74%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 20.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-9.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
49.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 12.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
140.04%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
77.13%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.93%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
77.62%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.24%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.14%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.51%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 48.10%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
2.79%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 44.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.