PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
78.11%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 6.96%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
153.46%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 478.84%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
56.56%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-12.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.08%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
244.59%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 1363.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
84.79%
Operating expenses growth less than half of KGC's 365.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
144.89%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 468.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1333.12%
Interest expense growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
230.63%
D&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 10.08%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
75.24%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
56.27%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-163.83%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 180.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
54.64%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1487.52%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.49%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.06%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.14%
Share count increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.13%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.