95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.22%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of KGC's 127.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 129.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-181.22%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 1375.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.90%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.55%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-7.74%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.35%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 151.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.15%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 158.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Operating income growth below 50% of KGC's 111.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 112.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.72%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 108.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 109.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.11%
Tax expense growth less than half of KGC's 2043.75%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.01%
Net income decline while KGC shows 103.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.96%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 104.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
EPS decline while KGC shows 104.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 104.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.