95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.16%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 11.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.23%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 13.61%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-18.53%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
G&A growth less than half of KGC's 6.94%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of KGC's 7.73%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.52%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 12.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-46.66%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 120.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.16%
D&A growth 50-75% of KGC's 9.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-14.37%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 7.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.68%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 14.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.52%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 0.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6171.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-20.45%
Net income decline while KGC shows 48.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.44%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 33.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
EPS decline while KGC shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.24%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.