95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.63%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 3.71%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.27%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of KGC's 12.36%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-2.12%
Margin decline while KGC shows 8.35% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.93%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 533.33%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-21.17%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.93%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.35%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 0.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.65%
D&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 8.59%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
16.07%
Similar EBITDA growth to KGC's 15.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
3.45%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of KGC's 12.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of KGC's 40.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.12%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 35.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-535.20%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-91.87%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 39.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.72%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 34.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
170.24%
Tax expense growth less than half of KGC's 436.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-92.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.19%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.