95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.80%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 7.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.06%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.19%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 57.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.88%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 46.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.92%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 988.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-46.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.05%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 10.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.35%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 57.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.75%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 55.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.19%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 99.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.88%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 99.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1578.19%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 25.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-288.47%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 79.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-302.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 80.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5700.00%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 742.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-278.54%
Net income decline while KGC shows 36.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-291.57%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 40.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.62%
EPS decline while KGC shows 36.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.62%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 36.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.