95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.83%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
40.51%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 86.80%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
16.30%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
G&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 16.74%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.07%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.18%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
40.29%
Total costs growth 50-75% of KGC's 75.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
218.69%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x KGC's 29.33%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
50.21%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.23%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.31%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.77%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.72%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-68.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
78.26%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of KGC's 151.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-76.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.35%
Diluted share reduction while KGC shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.