95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 3.86%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-0.43%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 17.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
27.82%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.39%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 23.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.45%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.41%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 6.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.97%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 16.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.87%
Interest expense growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.54%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 1.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
14.79%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.80%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.04%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.14%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.63%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.96%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.98%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-323.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
37.61%
Net income growth below 50% of KGC's 110.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.30%
Net margin growth below 50% of KGC's 109.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.71%
EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 109.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 109.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.90%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.99%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.