95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.42%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-26.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.86%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.96%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
G&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.34%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.49%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 619.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
106.14%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.15%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-27.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.60%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 38.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.30%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 61.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.52%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 236.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 254.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
91.81%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 518.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
474.46%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 308.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
650.14%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 336.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
168.82%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
463.45%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 215.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
635.77%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 231.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 217.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
460.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 217.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.