95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.88%
Revenue growth below 50% of KGC's 9.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
9.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of KGC's 73.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.58%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 59.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.49%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.69%
Operating expenses growth less than half of KGC's 40.20%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-3.37%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 2.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.71%
Interest expense growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.60%
EBITDA growth below 50% of KGC's 8.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.19%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.65%
Operating income growth below 50% of KGC's 115.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.70%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 97.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.30%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-534.38%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 1900.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.43%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.48%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.