PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.85%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 10.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-22.72%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.34%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 41.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.15%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 27.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
G&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 5.62%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
11.50%
Operating expenses change of 11.50% while KGC maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-20.93%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 1.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.25%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.37%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 1.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
346.56%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 5.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.22%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 9.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.45%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 72.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.14%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 56.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
97.25%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
149.05%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 12.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
159.70%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 1.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-148.72%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 173.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
149.47%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
160.22%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.