95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.60%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.02%
Cost growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.05%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.35%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.32%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.30%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.22%
Interest expense growth less than half of KGC's 25.38%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.08%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.36%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.39%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3964.56%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
365.59%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
336.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-564.74%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
367.01%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
338.10%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
380.00%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.22%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.08%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.