PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.54%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2.25%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 6.84%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-33.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 12.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-699.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.71%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 35.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.45%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 10.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
127.55%
Interest expense growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.58%
D&A growth less than half of KGC's 7.57%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-17.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.05%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.92%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 23.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-88.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
128.07%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x KGC's 39.75%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-89.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-87.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.89%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.89%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.10%
Share count change of 0.10% while KGC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.08%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.