95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 4.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
2.78%
Cost increase while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
12.55%
Gross profit growth below 50% of KGC's 94.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.36%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 86.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x KGC's 269.23%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 14.46%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.12%
Interest expense growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.87%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.85%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 25.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.36%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 11.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.38%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 151.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.32%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 149.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.52%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.99%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 96.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 96.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-79.93%
Net income decline while KGC shows 73.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 74.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
EPS decline while KGC shows 72.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 73.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.