95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 6.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.07%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 5.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.27%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 10.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.86%
Margin decline while KGC shows 3.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-308.55%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 11050.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-25.80%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.61%
Total costs reduction while KGC shows 3.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-10.17%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 9.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-137.27%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 14.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.36%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 9.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-256.60%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 25.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-286.01%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 17.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.85%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-322.67%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 26.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-364.48%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 19.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2407.27%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 65.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-317.43%
Net income decline while KGC shows 10.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-358.26%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-315.38%
EPS decline while KGC shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-315.38%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.31%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.