95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.14%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.41%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 76.00%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
28.42%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.51%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.92%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 1.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2134.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.78%
Operating expenses growth less than half of KGC's 42.65%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.94%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 71.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-51.23%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.89%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.68%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.43%
EBITDA margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.60%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.42%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.06%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.50%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
344.84%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.41%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.24%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.