95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.68%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 14.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.98%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.85%
Gross profit growth below 50% of KGC's 56.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.63%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 37.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.81%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
736.29%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 171.43%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
69.77%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 28.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.75%
Total costs growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.45%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 36.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.51%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 8.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.74%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 41.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.66%
EBITDA margin decline while KGC shows 20.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.90%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 66.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.33%
Operating margin decline while KGC shows 45.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
80.52%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 7.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-2.25%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 77.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of KGC's 54.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-156.85%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 127.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
11.50%
Net income growth below 50% of KGC's 59.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.58%
Net margin growth below 50% of KGC's 39.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 60.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 50.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.19%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.