95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.85%
Revenue decline while KGC shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.90%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-8.30%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 131.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.55%
Margin decline while KGC shows 119.06% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 42.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
131.63%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.96%
Operating expenses reduction while KGC shows 18.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.07%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-20.61%
Interest expense reduction while KGC shows 102.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.33%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 14.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.04%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 105.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.32%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of KGC's 97.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.75%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 152.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.48%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 138.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
74.66%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of KGC's 166.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.30%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of KGC's 152.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14030.23%
Tax expense reduction while KGC shows 39.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.90%
Net income growth below 50% of KGC's 225.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.62%
Net margin growth below 50% of KGC's 208.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 231.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of KGC's 226.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.09%
Share count change of 0.09% while KGC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.