95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.24%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
19.83%
Cost growth less than half of KGC's 823.27%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
8.19%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.04%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 169.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.04%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.98%
Total costs growth less than half of KGC's 300.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-88.07%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
18.16%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.10%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.00%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.85%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.74%
Tax expense growth while KGC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.04%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.86%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.