95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.94%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x KGC's 1.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
-0.14%
Cost reduction while KGC shows 9.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
3.70%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.73%
Margin expansion while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.08%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42650.00%
Other expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
61.11%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
4.24%
Total costs growth 50-75% of KGC's 8.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
417.94%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.63%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-1.41%
D&A reduction while KGC shows 7.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.17%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
221.93%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 72.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
2.31%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.37%
Pre-tax margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-76.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2.54%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.60%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.78%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.13%
Share count reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of KGC's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.