PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.14%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-15.59%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-3.04%
Gross profit decline while KGC shows 547.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.72%
Margin expansion below 50% of KGC's 618.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
G&A growth while KGC reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1449.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 6.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
3.79%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.11%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7152.63%
Interest expense growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-30.43%
EBITDA decline while KGC shows 124.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of KGC's 135.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.06%
Operating income decline while KGC shows 304.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.89%
Operating margin growth below 50% of KGC's 336.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-88.56%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 68.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.83%
Pre-tax income decline while KGC shows 214.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while KGC shows 232.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
46.81%
Tax expense growth less than half of KGC's 703.03%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-32.95%
Net income decline while KGC shows 185.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.20%
Net margin decline while KGC shows 198.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while KGC shows 184.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while KGC shows 183.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.25%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 1.25%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.