95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
44.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 4.00%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
45.91%
Cost growth above 1.5x KGC's 21.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
43.20%
Positive growth while KGC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.26%
G&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 2.71%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.66%
Other expenses reduction while KGC shows 222.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
22.30%
Operating expenses growth while KGC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
43.11%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 8.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-2.56%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
53.28%
D&A growth above 1.5x KGC's 8.99%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
50.51%
EBITDA growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
47.82%
Operating income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.39%
Operating margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-107.84%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
39.66%
Pre-tax income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.63%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
44.74%
Net income growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.26%
Net margin growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.00%
Diluted EPS growth while KGC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x KGC's 0.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.02%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.