95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.44%
Positive growth while KGC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-42.05%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
60.21%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x KGC's 28.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.79%
Similar margin change to KGC's 30.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
G&A reduction while KGC shows 17.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6243.42%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 251.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
825.37%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x KGC's 238.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
98.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x KGC's 3.44%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.07%
Interest expense growth less than half of KGC's 5.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
23.81%
D&A growth while KGC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-18.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of KGC's 71.55%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-31.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
35.25%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of KGC's 53.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-43.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while KGC shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while KGC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.