PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 11.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.55%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 1.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
355.66%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.17%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
144.32%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 19.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
136.76%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 46.36%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 148.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.30%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 121.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-70.39%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 22.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
224.31%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-56.84%
Net income decline while NEM shows 244.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-64.19%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 208.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.65%
EPS decline while NEM shows 250.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-83.65%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 250.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.