PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 4.68%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.83%
Cost growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
26.25%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 6.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.37%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x NEM's 1.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.94%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.17%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.68%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.01%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 5.97%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
26.25%
Similar EBITDA growth to NEM's 25.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
3.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 9.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.56%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 22.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
4.80%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 16.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
116.35%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.21%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 5.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.01%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.55%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-35.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
29.72%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.26%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Share count change of 0.01% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.