95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.36%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 10.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-14.12%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 18.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.63%
Growth of 9.63% while NEM shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
13.43%
Margin expansion while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.13%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 1.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.06%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 6.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.25%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 15.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.06%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 17.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.51%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 1.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.25%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 5.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
17.56%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-52.43%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 109.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.48%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
775.68%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 36.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
9.89%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.71%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.37%
Share count change of 10.37% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
20.16%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.