PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.51%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 32.49%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.37%
Cost growth less than half of NEM's 24.37%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 43.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.94%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 8.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-680.71%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 25.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-506.47%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-134.42%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 13.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.56%
D&A growth less than half of NEM's 28.86%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
96.31%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 58.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
86.99%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 357.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
118.24%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 104.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
108.82%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 54.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
258.57%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.39%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
109.92%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4162.76%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.52%
Net income growth below 50% of NEM's 12.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.97%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Similar EPS growth to NEM's 11.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
11.11%
Similar diluted EPS growth to NEM's 11.36%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.25%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.72%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.