PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.05%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 3.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.69%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-4.94%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 20.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 15.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
15.76%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.08%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
83.18%
Interest expense change of 83.18% while NEM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.76%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.94%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 18.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.37%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 456.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.75%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 76.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.88%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 70.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-14.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-488.93%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.36%
Share count change of 0.36% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.53%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.