PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.50%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 26.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.48%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-7.30%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 73.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.94%
Margin decline while NEM shows 37.59% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.28%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.20%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.59%
Interest expense change of 3.59% while NEM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-14.49%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.16%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 72.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.62%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 144.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.18%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 93.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.65%
Other expenses growth less than half of NEM's 97.95%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-6.01%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 283.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.58%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 245.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
145.30%
Tax expense growth less than half of NEM's 465.22%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-16.06%
Net income decline while NEM shows 119.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.11%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 115.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
EPS decline while NEM shows 119.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.11%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 119.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.34%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.44%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.