95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.85%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.01%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
32.57%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.51%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 12.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.31%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NEM's 106.61%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
21.65%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.46%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.23%
Interest expense change of 16.23% while NEM maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
35.54%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.13%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.41%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 225.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.93%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.01%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-39.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.88%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.18%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.18%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 13.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
29.71%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.25%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.49%
Diluted share change of 1.49% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.