95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.56%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 46.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.24%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 45.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.22%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 47.69%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.95%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.51%
Similar other expenses growth to NEM's 31.88%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
53.37%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.69%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 2.78%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-99.80%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.18%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 31.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.37%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 135.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.57%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 211.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.15%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 111.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
99.79%
Similar other expenses growth to NEM's 99.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
5.68%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of NEM's 167.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.45%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 146.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-129.90%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 147.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.24%
Net income growth below 50% of NEM's 226.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 185.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.18%
EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 226.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 225.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.