95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
222.53%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-82.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.47%
Margin decline while NEM shows 2.33% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.30%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 192.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-7.42%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 117.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
147.69%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 25.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.48%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.59%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-86.12%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-95.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2651.65%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 411.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-365.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-365.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-119.87%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-362.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-361.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-300.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-325.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.15%
Share count change of 16.15% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
9.54%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 3.74%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.