95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.31%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 15.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-61.24%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
428.44%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 47.47%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
421.61%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x NEM's 27.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25234.62%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
147.24%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-35.87%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.24%
D&A change of 12.24% while NEM maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
450.00%
Similar EBITDA growth to NEM's 442.77%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
414.53%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to NEM's 396.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
1191.12%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 518.37%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1174.45%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 461.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.49%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
129.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of NEM's 1021.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
129.49%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 896.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-225.74%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 219.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
130.31%
Net income growth below 50% of NEM's 1790.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
129.91%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 1534.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
133.33%
EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 1786.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 1786.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.