PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.51%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 27.90%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
75.60%
Cost growth above 1.5x NEM's 9.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
62.95%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 43.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.30%
Margin decline while NEM shows 12.38% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.89%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
58.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.75%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.09%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 13.07%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
85.52%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 67.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
10.10%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 31.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
82.56%
Similar operating income growth to NEM's 87.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
8.34%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 46.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-109.74%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 207.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
82.05%
Similar pre-tax income growth to NEM's 96.95%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
8.04%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 53.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
Tax expense growth less than half of NEM's 86.03%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
82.05%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 26.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.04%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.14%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 27.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
83.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 27.42%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.19%
Share count change of 5.19% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
5.38%
Diluted share change of 5.38% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.