95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.28%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 20.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
52.94%
Cost growth above 1.5x NEM's 6.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.67%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 31.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.74%
Margin decline while NEM shows 8.60% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 4.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1803.01%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-157.58%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 4.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.49%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 4.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-8.36%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 30.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.21%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 18.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.08%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 46.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.88%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 21.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.44%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-131.15%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 27.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.00%
Net income growth 50-75% of NEM's 40.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
33.04%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 16.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
75.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 39.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 38.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.45%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.60%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.