95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
61.12%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.81%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
80.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 14.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.30%
Margin expansion 50-75% of NEM's 16.71%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.55%
G&A growth less than half of NEM's 295.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.45%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 80.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
547.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 48.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
88.65%
Total costs growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.04%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
45.74%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 6.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-9.55%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 13.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.43%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.53%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 5.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
140.04%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
77.13%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.93%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-84.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
77.62%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 51.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.24%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 54.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
157.14%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 51.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
157.14%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 54.21%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.51%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.79%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.