PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.12%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
12.97%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
25.66%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.06%
Margin expansion while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.32%
G&A growth less than half of NEM's 153.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
33.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 11.51%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
16.64%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.94%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.89%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.44%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.79%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.36%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
278.87%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.62%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.03%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
189.28%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.19%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.53%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.