PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.77%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.16%
Cost growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-0.21%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 0.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.68%
Margin decline while NEM shows 0.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 68.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.44%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 74.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.33%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 29.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.09%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 9.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.32%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.46%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.18%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-395.45%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.08%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
7.19%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.46%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.89%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.06%
Share count change of 0.06% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.02%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.