95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.89%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
38.55%
Cost growth 50-75% of NEM's 57.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
-39.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.62%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.99%
Other expenses growth less than half of NEM's 75.68%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-4.54%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 23.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
32.58%
Total costs growth 50-75% of NEM's 53.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
271.32%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 7.69%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
69.79%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 55.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-28.29%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-305.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-47.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-46.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.37%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.95%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.11%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.