95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.29%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.13%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-0.43%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 964.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.14%
Margin decline while NEM shows 968.36% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.77%
Other expenses growth less than half of NEM's 94.44%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-0.98%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 9.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-34.53%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 8.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.27%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.87%
EBITDA growth below 50% of NEM's 131.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of NEM's 629.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.43%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 230.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.14%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 231.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of NEM's 107.92%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
8.09%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of NEM's 122.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.41%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of NEM's 122.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.95%
Tax expense reduction while NEM shows 147.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.35%
Net income growth below 50% of NEM's 119.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.67%
Net margin growth below 50% of NEM's 119.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 119.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of NEM's 119.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.