95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.22%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-4.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.53%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 14.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 40.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.32%
G&A change of 34.32% while NEM maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-181.22%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 84.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
33.90%
Operating expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.55%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 1.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.74%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.35%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 114.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.15%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 29.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Operating income growth below 50% of NEM's 74.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of NEM's 114.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-30.73%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 96.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.72%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 106.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 108.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.11%
Similar tax expense growth to NEM's 109.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
-15.01%
Net income decline while NEM shows 108.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.96%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 110.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
EPS decline while NEM shows 108.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.38%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 108.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.