PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.16%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 0.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.23%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-18.53%
Gross profit decline while NEM shows 4.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.31%
Margin decline while NEM shows 4.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
G&A growth less than half of NEM's 6.67%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.81%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of NEM's 6.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.52%
Total costs growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-46.66%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 1.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.16%
D&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.68%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-14.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.20%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 2.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.53%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 1.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.31%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 1.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.68%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 17.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6171.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-20.45%
Net income decline while NEM shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.44%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 79.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
EPS decline while NEM shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.18%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.07%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.20%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.