95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.80%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 6.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.06%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 13.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.19%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.88%
Margin expansion while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.70%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.92%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 210.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.96%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.40%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 9.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-46.37%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-15.05%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 19.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-9.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.75%
EBITDA margin decline while NEM shows 21.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.88%
Operating margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1578.19%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 118.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-288.47%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 46.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-302.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 37.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5700.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-278.54%
Net income decline while NEM shows 204.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-291.57%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 185.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.62%
EPS decline while NEM shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-284.62%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.06%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.25%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.06%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.05%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.