PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.25%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.30%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.71%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
29.46%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 5.72%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.32%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x NEM's 5.41%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 12.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-153.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.12%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 22.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.98%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-33.79%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.22%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.93%
EBITDA growth below 50% of NEM's 41.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.54%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.40%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 1.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.33%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.16%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
50.07%
Pre-tax income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.52%
Pre-tax margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.16%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
47.16%
Net income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.95%
Net margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.00%
Diluted EPS growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.38%
Share count reduction below 50% of NEM's 10.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.40%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of NEM's 10.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.