95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.84%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-5.28%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.38%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.13%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 46.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.55%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 8.18%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.94%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 7.81%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
19.52%
D&A growth 50-75% of NEM's 28.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
8.28%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.35%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-969.24%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-86.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-88.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.49%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-86.91%
Net income decline while NEM shows 3.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-88.19%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 3.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.84%
EPS decline while NEM shows 2.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.84%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 2.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.19%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.01%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.