95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.68%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.21%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
2.85%
Cost growth 50-75% of NEM's 5.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
0.02%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-399.25%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 250.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.04%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.38%
Total costs growth 50-75% of NEM's 4.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.88%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.47%
D&A growth 50-75% of NEM's 6.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
3.07%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.37%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.30%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.70%
Tax expense growth while NEM reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.53%
Net income decline while NEM shows 17.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.15%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 17.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share count change of 0.07% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 0.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.