PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.46%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 2.98%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.50%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.06%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 12.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-3.69%
Margin decline while NEM shows 9.17% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 13.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1387.56%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 233.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-1.79%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 29.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.94%
Total costs growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.14%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
24.09%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-139.74%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.66%
EBITDA margin growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.70%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 3.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.31%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 0.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2772.70%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 6.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-307.96%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 3.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-274.08%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 0.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
25.86%
Tax expense growth less than half of NEM's 977.78%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-306.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-273.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-306.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.14%
Share count change of 0.14% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.16%
Diluted share increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.