PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.60%
Positive growth while NEM shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.02%
Cost increase while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
2.05%
Positive growth while NEM shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
G&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 6.78%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.35%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 18.01%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.30%
Total costs growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.22%
Interest expense growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.08%
D&A growth while NEM reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.36%
EBITDA growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.39%
Operating income growth while NEM declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3964.56%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 46.51%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
365.59%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 7.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
336.77%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 17.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-564.74%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
367.01%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 52.08%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
338.10%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 66.27%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
380.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 52.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x NEM's 50.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.10%
Share count increase while NEM reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.13%
Diluted share change of 0.13% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.