PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.83%
Revenue growth below 50% of NEM's 18.66%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.78%
Cost growth less than half of NEM's 11.28%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
12.55%
Gross profit growth below 50% of NEM's 40.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.36%
Margin expansion below 50% of NEM's 18.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
G&A growth above 1.5x NEM's 6.78%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
323.19%
Other expenses growth while NEM reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
150.94%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x NEM's 32.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.61%
Similar total costs growth to NEM's 13.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
31.12%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x NEM's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
4.87%
D&A growth less than half of NEM's 12.37%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-3.85%
EBITDA decline while NEM shows 166.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Operating income decline while NEM shows 46.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.32%
Operating margin decline while NEM shows 23.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.52%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 74.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.99%
Pre-tax income decline while NEM shows 317.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while NEM shows 283.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1963.31%
Tax expense growth less than half of NEM's 8566.67%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-79.93%
Net income decline while NEM shows 101.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.03%
Net margin decline while NEM shows 101.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
EPS decline while NEM shows 101.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-81.25%
Diluted EPS decline while NEM shows 101.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count change of 0.17% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while NEM is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.