PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while NEM shows 25.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.07%
Cost reduction while NEM shows 43.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.27%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
G&A reduction while NEM shows 37.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-308.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-25.80%
Operating expenses reduction while NEM shows 62.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.61%
Total costs reduction while NEM shows 45.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.83%
Interest expense reduction while NEM shows 41.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.17%
D&A reduction while NEM shows 56.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-137.27%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-256.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-286.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.85%
Other expenses reduction while NEM shows 92.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-322.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-364.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2407.27%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-317.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-358.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-315.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-315.38%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.31%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 43.45%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x NEM's 43.82%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.